On 2 April, the Post wrote, "The usual banana republic" that the Lazio Regional Administrative Court annulled the Decree of 23 July 2009.
Since then, the Minister for Productive Scajola resigned without being more 'replaced by some and to reinstate the DM in my opinion if it speaks more' for years. I've never been
's agreement on how the DM wanted to address the problem of "rejuvenation" of the plants but, however' should be accepted that the problem exists and something must be done in terms of adaptation of plants dating back to safety standards more whereas that technology has advanced greatly in the 'last half-century years, giving to the elevators can also work with most standard' safe.
In Italy everything is always good when it happens until the 'incident, and then pandemonium breaks loose, let' s example of a plant where the old single-speed of round tripping on the step threshold between landing and car, he falls and breaks her hip, the family of the old building which had denounced the regular maintenance contract with a maintenance company relies on it and what happens?
happens very likely that if the company had previously made a budget adjustment of 'system and this had not been approved by' communal assembly, the blame falls on the building had not been made otherwise if anything, the blame falls on the company manutentrice.
All because the EN 8180 is in force for years, but without the DM implementation you can not 'stop any non-standard system, but because this facility continues to be outside the norm.
I have always been 's idea that beyond a certain age' s plant would be replaced in its entirety, but effective and free radical solution of interpretations, we chose an 'other road and not even that you are driving, you chose the road I remember nothing of the whole country with the most 'high number of lifts.
So, from that situation if they must leave, you must stop with the logic of the need to plan for emergencies but with serious things, but this is utopia right now.
